Ice-Cores prove the Earth is 680,000 yrs old
or does it??
Scientific Assumptions
With all scientific conclusions, there are always assumptions that are made by scientist. This idea that earth is millions of years old is no different in that there are many assumptions. Likewise Ice-Core proof of earth's lengthy ages also has it's assumptions. Its biggest assumption here is that Ice-Rings are exactly like Tree-Rings, where 1 ice-ring is formed every year just like tree-rings are. So when scientist in Greenland counted over 680,000 Ice-Rings in ice cylinders and each is ASSUMED to form in 1yr, that would mean the ice was at least 680,000 yrs old.
With all scientific conclusions, there are always assumptions that are made by scientist. This idea that earth is millions of years old is no different in that there are many assumptions. Likewise Ice-Core proof of earth's lengthy ages also has it's assumptions. Its biggest assumption here is that Ice-Rings are exactly like Tree-Rings, where 1 ice-ring is formed every year just like tree-rings are. So when scientist in Greenland counted over 680,000 Ice-Rings in ice cylinders and each is ASSUMED to form in 1yr, that would mean the ice was at least 680,000 yrs old.
What the Science/History really found
In 1942, 6 P-38 fighter planes and 2 B-17 bombers were forced to land in the frozen ice of Greenland. The planes were left and pilots rescued. In 1988 the planes were rediscovered. If the scientific assumption of 1 ice layer per year was correct, 46 years later should equal about 50 feet or so of ice. So why was it so difficult to find the planes if there was supposed to be only 50 feet of ice? Because instead of 50 feet of ice they found the planes buried 250 feet of solid ice.
In 1992 they decided to bore down and retrieve one of these planes. The borehole revealed so-called annual layers could form multiple such layers in a year, as the temperature changed. Multiple layers even forming during a single storm.
Ref: WWII P-38 Discovered Under 300 Feet of Ice in Greenland | Recovered 'Lost Squadron' Plane Leads to New Mystery
In 1942, 6 P-38 fighter planes and 2 B-17 bombers were forced to land in the frozen ice of Greenland. The planes were left and pilots rescued. In 1988 the planes were rediscovered. If the scientific assumption of 1 ice layer per year was correct, 46 years later should equal about 50 feet or so of ice. So why was it so difficult to find the planes if there was supposed to be only 50 feet of ice? Because instead of 50 feet of ice they found the planes buried 250 feet of solid ice.
In 1992 they decided to bore down and retrieve one of these planes. The borehole revealed so-called annual layers could form multiple such layers in a year, as the temperature changed. Multiple layers even forming during a single storm.
Ref: WWII P-38 Discovered Under 300 Feet of Ice in Greenland | Recovered 'Lost Squadron' Plane Leads to New Mystery
Further Data from Ice-Cores
Laying aside the dating data showing that their dating is flawed. The cores also reveal temperature change over time and a pattern quickly emerges that earth has had hot peaks followed by mini-ice ages all throughout history. But taking their time line and all its flaws. We see that global temperature spikes have occurred long before the industrial revolution. Furthermore in the 2000s we have been in a large cooling trend unseen for millenial, and it is when climate scientist have been saying our CO2 emissions have been at their highest since man has been on earth. Clearly CO2 would appear by the data to be cause of global temperatures crashing. According to their data we should be emitting more CO2 not less to ensure sea level rise does not occur, drowning the globe. Directly opposite to what scientist have been warned against.
If they can be lying so blatantly about something so simple as data and what it means, What else can they be lying about?
Laying aside the dating data showing that their dating is flawed. The cores also reveal temperature change over time and a pattern quickly emerges that earth has had hot peaks followed by mini-ice ages all throughout history. But taking their time line and all its flaws. We see that global temperature spikes have occurred long before the industrial revolution. Furthermore in the 2000s we have been in a large cooling trend unseen for millenial, and it is when climate scientist have been saying our CO2 emissions have been at their highest since man has been on earth. Clearly CO2 would appear by the data to be cause of global temperatures crashing. According to their data we should be emitting more CO2 not less to ensure sea level rise does not occur, drowning the globe. Directly opposite to what scientist have been warned against.
If they can be lying so blatantly about something so simple as data and what it means, What else can they be lying about?
Conclusion using "the science" (observable)
A single storm can lay down multiple layers. Greenland has hundreds of storms each year. And 50 years yielded far more than 50 annual layers of ice. So the data shows that that the ice could be only thousands of years old. This falls in perfect alignment with the Bible where God himself insists life began only 6 thousands years ago. This also falls in line with C-14 detectable in all fossils showing they are less than 40,000 yrs old and a whole host of other scientific facts that strongly suggest the Bible short time period for the age of the earth is correct.
A single storm can lay down multiple layers. Greenland has hundreds of storms each year. And 50 years yielded far more than 50 annual layers of ice. So the data shows that that the ice could be only thousands of years old. This falls in perfect alignment with the Bible where God himself insists life began only 6 thousands years ago. This also falls in line with C-14 detectable in all fossils showing they are less than 40,000 yrs old and a whole host of other scientific facts that strongly suggest the Bible short time period for the age of the earth is correct.