Lucy (Australopithecus afarensis)
Discovered in Africa in 1974, Lucy was hailed the missing link evolutionist had been looking for.Magazines, newspapers, television shows, school textbooks, and national museums will spread the latest ‘proof’ of human evolution like wildfire. What they didn't tell you was the following, from questions taken after a lecture given by Lucy's finder, Dr. Donald Johanson:
Discovered in Africa in 1974, Lucy was hailed the missing link evolutionist had been looking for.Magazines, newspapers, television shows, school textbooks, and national museums will spread the latest ‘proof’ of human evolution like wildfire. What they didn't tell you was the following, from questions taken after a lecture given by Lucy's finder, Dr. Donald Johanson:
- The skeleton was only 30 - 40% complete
- The knee bones were actually discovered about a year earlier than the rest of Lucy.
- The knee bones were about 200 feet lower in strata and 2 to 3 kilometers away (about 1.5 miles or 26.4 football fields away)
- had a chimp-sized brain, chimp-shaped rib cage and jawbone, and arms and legs that indicate it walked like a chimp. It even had a chimp shaped pelvis.
- Two world-famous British and American anatomists, Lord Solly Zuckerman and Professor Charles Oxnard concluded separately that Australopithecus specimens were not bipedal but moved in the same manner as modern apes.
Ref: Donald Johanson: Was Lucy a Hoax?,Problem with Lucy & Skull, Lucy Deceit, Adieu Lucy "Australopithecus could not be considered the ancestor of man, Richard Allan & Tracey Greenwood, Primates and Human Evolution in the textbook: Year 13 Biology 1999. Student Resource and Activity Manual, Biozone International. Printed in New Zealand, p. 260. | Solly Zuckerman, Beyond The Ivory Tower, New York: Toplinger Publications, 1970, pp. 75-94. | Charles E. Oxnard, "The Place of Australopithecines in Human Evolution: Grounds for Doubt", Nature, vol. 258, p. 389. | E. Stokstad, "Hominid ancestors may have knuckle walked," Science 287(5461): 2131, 2000.| Time, Lemonick and Dorfman, p. 61. | Isabelle Bourdial, "Adieu Lucy," Science et Vie, May 1999, no. 980, pp. 52-62.
- "Echoing the criticism made of his father's habilis skulls, he added that Lucy's skull was so incomplete that most of it was 'imagination made of plaster of Paris', thus making it impossible to draw any firm conclusion about what species she belonged to." --Referring to comments of Richard Leakey(Director of National Museums of Kenya), The Weekend Australian, 7-8 May 1983, p. 3
- "The australopithecenes are now irrevocably removed from a place in the evolution of human bipedalism and certainly from any place in the direct human lineage." --Charles Oxnard
Nebraska Man (Hesperopithecus haroldcooki)
Found in 1922 by Henry Fairfield Osborn, the director of the American Museum of Natural History, this missing link was quickly placed into all textbooks. Imaginative drawings in the Illustrated London News gave the impression a complete caveman had been found, when only a tooth had been found.
Nevertheless Nebraska Man was exclusively used as proof forcing the 1925 "Monkey Trial" to force the teaching of evolution as a fact in American schools. In 1927 the rest of the skeleton was found. What the textbooks didn't tell you was:
Then all the drawings of Hesperopithecus haroldcooki and his "family" were hurriedly removed from evolutionary literature.
Ref: "Hesperopithecus: Apparently Not an ape Nor a man" --Science,William Gregory,1927, Nebraska Man Retraction,
Found in 1922 by Henry Fairfield Osborn, the director of the American Museum of Natural History, this missing link was quickly placed into all textbooks. Imaginative drawings in the Illustrated London News gave the impression a complete caveman had been found, when only a tooth had been found.
Nevertheless Nebraska Man was exclusively used as proof forcing the 1925 "Monkey Trial" to force the teaching of evolution as a fact in American schools. In 1927 the rest of the skeleton was found. What the textbooks didn't tell you was:
- Nebraska Man was based on a single fossilized molar tooth
- The rest of skeleton turned to be that of an extinct species of wild American pig called Prosthennops
Then all the drawings of Hesperopithecus haroldcooki and his "family" were hurriedly removed from evolutionary literature.
Ref: "Hesperopithecus: Apparently Not an ape Nor a man" --Science,William Gregory,1927, Nebraska Man Retraction,
- How resourceful and imaginative scientific "experts" can be at times. Give them a tooth, not necessarily human, and they can create an entire race of prehistoric humanity. (Scott M. Huse, The Collapse of Evolution, pp. 97-98.)
Piltdown Man (Eoanthropus dawsoni "Dawson's dawn-man")
Found in 1912 by Charles Dawson in a gravel pit near Piltdown, England, Piltdown Man was heralded as man's missing link proving man's evolutionary past beyond a shadow of a doubt.
Found in 1912 by Charles Dawson in a gravel pit near Piltdown, England, Piltdown Man was heralded as man's missing link proving man's evolutionary past beyond a shadow of a doubt.
- Piltdown Man is based on 1 ape-like jawbone, fragments of a man-like skullcap, & a canine tooth
- 1953 scientist found:
|
|
In light of these discoveries the Piltdown Man was quickly removed from display at the British Museum.
Ref: UK Nat History Museum:Piltdown-man-hoax, Piltdown_Man,
Ref: UK Nat History Museum:Piltdown-man-hoax, Piltdown_Man,
- More than five hundred articles and memoirs are said to have been written about Piltdown man. (Nature vol. 274, #4419 (10 July 1954) pp. 61-62).
- KennethOakely "... radioactive flourine test proved the skull fragments were many thousands of years older than the jaw. They could not be from the same individual unless, as one scientist put it, `the man died but his jaw lingered on for a few thousand years' " (R. Milner, Encyclopedia of Evolution (1990), p. 363).
Neanderthal Man (Homo neanderthalensis)
Discovered in Neander Valley in 1856, evolutionist suggested Neanderthal was a hunched over primitive ape-man. However even Neanderthal expert and evolutionist admitted that nothing of Neanderthal's skeleton suggest he was different than mondern humans. Experts have now concluded that Neanderthal would be unrecognizable if dressed in a suit and tie in the middle of New York city. The reason is because of the information they have withheld from you:
|
"Detailed comparisons of Neanderthal skeltal remains with those of modern humans have shown that there is nothing in Neanderthal anatomy that conclusively indicates locomotor, manipulative, intellectual, or languistic abilities inferior to those of modern humans." --Erik Trinkhaus
Ramapithecus
Found in 1930s in India and later Africa, Ramapithecus was described as a more advanced primate that appeared 14 million years ago. What they didn't tell you was what they used to determine what this ancestor looked like:
Found in 1930s in India and later Africa, Ramapithecus was described as a more advanced primate that appeared 14 million years ago. What they didn't tell you was what they used to determine what this ancestor looked like:
- based entirely on 2 jawbone fragments that were each only 2 inches long
- 1981 anatomical comparisions found them to be identical to a baboon skeleton
Java Man (Homo erectus)
Dubois assumed that apelike bones near a human bone meant the two belonged to the same creature, constituting Darwin’s missing link. In 1895, Dubois returned to Europe and displayed his fossils. The response from experts was mixed, however. Rudolph Virchow, who is regarded as the father of modern pathology, said: “In my opinion, this creature was an animal, a giant gibbon, in fact. The thigh bone has not the slightest connection with the skull.”
In 1907, an expedition of German scientists traveled to Java seeking more clues to man’s ancestry in the region of Dubois’ discovery. However, no evidence for Pithecanthropus was found. The expedition’s report also noted a nearby volcano that caused periodic flooding in the area. Java Man had been found in volcanic sediments. The report observed that the chemical nature of those sediments, not ancient age, probably caused the fossilization of Pithecanthropus.
Despite, the expedition’s findings and various deficiencies of Dubois’ work were largely ignored, and Java Man became one of evolution’s undisputed “facts.”
Dubois assumed that apelike bones near a human bone meant the two belonged to the same creature, constituting Darwin’s missing link. In 1895, Dubois returned to Europe and displayed his fossils. The response from experts was mixed, however. Rudolph Virchow, who is regarded as the father of modern pathology, said: “In my opinion, this creature was an animal, a giant gibbon, in fact. The thigh bone has not the slightest connection with the skull.”
In 1907, an expedition of German scientists traveled to Java seeking more clues to man’s ancestry in the region of Dubois’ discovery. However, no evidence for Pithecanthropus was found. The expedition’s report also noted a nearby volcano that caused periodic flooding in the area. Java Man had been found in volcanic sediments. The report observed that the chemical nature of those sediments, not ancient age, probably caused the fossilization of Pithecanthropus.
Despite, the expedition’s findings and various deficiencies of Dubois’ work were largely ignored, and Java Man became one of evolution’s undisputed “facts.”
- Several skull caps and a couple of teeth
- Several human remains were found in the same caves
- A common practice even today, but largely prohibited, of people in China and Indo-China is eating monkey brains and even gorilla brains where they pop off the skull cap of the monkey or gorilla to eat the brains, as the rest of the gibbon's skin is too tough for consumption.
Peking Man (Homo erectus pekinensis)
Then there was Peking Man, worked on and validated by a number of Piltdown alumni. In seeing textbook portrayals of Peking Man, few students learned that the skulls had been found in scattered little fragments, and that the reconstructions were actually composites taken from various individuals.
Where fragments were missing, plaster was substituted, and the famous final images of Peking Man were the creations of a sculptress named Lucille Swann. Later, all of the Peking Man fossils mysteriously vanished, except for a couple of teeth, preventing Peking Man from being subjected to the kind of checking that doomed Piltdown Man.
Then there was Peking Man, worked on and validated by a number of Piltdown alumni. In seeing textbook portrayals of Peking Man, few students learned that the skulls had been found in scattered little fragments, and that the reconstructions were actually composites taken from various individuals.
Where fragments were missing, plaster was substituted, and the famous final images of Peking Man were the creations of a sculptress named Lucille Swann. Later, all of the Peking Man fossils mysteriously vanished, except for a couple of teeth, preventing Peking Man from being subjected to the kind of checking that doomed Piltdown Man.
Who will YOU trust?
It should be clear by these hoaxes presented as proof of evolution, that scientist are willing to go to extraordinary efforts to deceive us into accepting evolution as a fact, when it clearly is not. Are these hoaxes more convincing than the Bible? The Bible which has been proven 100% true in Science, Medicine, History & Archaelogy, and Prophecy, says we were CREATED by a supernatural, all powerful God in an instant, with no gradual changes necessary.
Will you trust? These MANMADE HOAXES or the God of the Bible who says He created you and loves you so much that He sent His Son, Jesus, to die for your sins and make you right with God so you can go to Heaven. If you want to trust the God who created the universe and everything in it, all you have to do is accept Jesus by believing in Him and calling upon Him to save you. Won't you do it today?
It should be clear by these hoaxes presented as proof of evolution, that scientist are willing to go to extraordinary efforts to deceive us into accepting evolution as a fact, when it clearly is not. Are these hoaxes more convincing than the Bible? The Bible which has been proven 100% true in Science, Medicine, History & Archaelogy, and Prophecy, says we were CREATED by a supernatural, all powerful God in an instant, with no gradual changes necessary.
Will you trust? These MANMADE HOAXES or the God of the Bible who says He created you and loves you so much that He sent His Son, Jesus, to die for your sins and make you right with God so you can go to Heaven. If you want to trust the God who created the universe and everything in it, all you have to do is accept Jesus by believing in Him and calling upon Him to save you. Won't you do it today?
Dear Lord God. I know I am a sinner and need your gift of salvation from my sins. I BELIEVE IN JESUS, the Son of God, as my personal Savior. I believe that His death on the cross and resurrection provides forgiveness for ALL my sins past, present, & future. Please forgive all my sins and come into my heart and life. I hereby trust in Jesus FINISHED WORK alone, and NOT upon me & my "good works", as sufficient to make me right with you and fit for Heaven. Please forgive ALL my sins and come into my heart, Lord Jesus. Seal me with your Holy Spirit until the day you come to take me home. In your Son Jesus’ name. Amen.
|